Litigations & Claims
Introduction
Tiger Lily Care is legally obliged to investigate any litigation or claims brought against us, and this will require us to access, process, and hold some of your personal identifiable data. The data Tiger Lily Care will need to process will depend on the type of litigation or claim received.
Purpose of the processing
Legal obligations of Tiger Lily Care.
Lawful Basis of the processing
The lawful justifications for the processing and possible sharing of this data under Data Protection Legislation are:
Article 6(1)(c): “the processing is necessary for compliance with any legal obligation to which the controller is subject”.
Article 9(f): “the processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims or whenever courts are acting in their judicial capacity”
Data Recipient or Categories of Recipient
The data may be shared with organisations such as:
- Our solicitors or legal team.
- The Court processing the claim.
- Any regulatory body who has a statutory basis for evidencing, overseeing, investigating, or substantiating litigation, a claim or national or professional standards such as the Care Quality Commission and other bodies or the outcomes of such action.
Right to Object
You have the right under Article 21 of the GDPR to object to your personal information being processed. Please contact Tiger Lily Care if you wish to object to the processing of your data. You should be aware that this is a right to raise an objection which is not the same as having an absolute right to have your wishes granted in every circumstance.
Tiger Lily Care processes personal data under Article 6(1)(c) on a lawful and legitimate basis where the organisation is obliged under law to comply with:
- The UK General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR)
- The Data Protection Act 2018
- The Freedom of Information Act
- The NHS Constitution
- The Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009
By complying with these laws, Tiger Lily Care has compelling legitimate grounds for the processing which override the interests, rights and freedoms in the right to object